tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post5964834821647211971..comments2024-03-28T04:07:50.925-07:00Comments on Pud Whacker's Madonna Scrapbook: Who's Zoom'n Who, Now? Miss Jackson if you're Beastly.Pud Whackerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01330028293649667913noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-33609339278886582462012-01-30T09:31:11.126-08:002012-01-30T09:31:11.126-08:00I do not in any way think this was a swipe at Jane...I do not in any way think this was a swipe at Janet Jackson. In the way she responds, she's clearly including herself in the "you don't have to show a nipple to be cutting-edge," etc. Just more drama that's not needed. I'm sure Janet and her fans will take it that way, though, and this will almost certainly be brought up at the press conference as a slam.Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11019970115004143708noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-88224929132237200062012-01-30T03:10:25.810-08:002012-01-30T03:10:25.810-08:00madonna played with the subject of sex outside of ...madonna played with the subject of sex outside of and prior to the 'sex' book and the album 'erotica' - namely the justify my love video, the blonde ambition tour and accompanying doco. i saw all of these when i was a minor and they were all easily accessible to me... furtheremore i saw a lot of it on family networks such as mtv! so i can't appreciate your argument there im sorry.<br /><br />this janet bashing reminds me of kurt loders lame attempt at bitching during the ray of light mtv special. he tried to get a rise out of m by knocking janet's exploration of bondage/sex on her acclaimed 'velvet rope' album (which was out at the time), saying it was 'so 5 years ago' to explore these themes in pop music (referring to how m explored it during her erotica phase as many years earlier).<br /><br />i thought this was an incredibly stupid quip as bondage and certainly sex are as old as time itseld and who is kurt to say that it is not possible for janet to have these experiences on a very personal level, completely independant to any pop culture zeitgeist? she is a woman and human being first, and a musical artist second. i thought, what a sheltered little mtv world you live in kurt. thankfully m didn't rise to the bait and ignored the comment. little man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-30188261258816008032012-01-30T02:59:13.514-08:002012-01-30T02:59:13.514-08:00the way you talk.the way you talk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-25511189704012249772012-01-30T02:58:18.193-08:002012-01-30T02:58:18.193-08:00i don't care what anyone says or where she is ...i don't care what anyone says or where she is in her career now - janet is wonderful. she made some incredible pop music and changed the scene for a while there. and the velvet rope album is a masterpiece and an album i often go back to.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-85902031253549939282012-01-28T20:02:11.242-08:002012-01-28T20:02:11.242-08:00Janet was always FAR more interesting to watch the...Janet was always FAR more interesting to watch then any of those people. All combined, actually.Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-9729635491824622432012-01-28T20:01:20.658-08:002012-01-28T20:01:20.658-08:00Not really. Her problem was the music. The album s...Not really. Her problem was the music. The album she released right after the SB was bad. That first single? Just a little while? They didn't even release the official video to her DVD collection it was that bad LOL.<br /><br />Now Rock With U should have been big. That was an excellent track.Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-72587603664806075112012-01-28T19:59:45.617-08:002012-01-28T19:59:45.617-08:00You dumb fuck (slide). I SAID it was on purpose. O...You dumb fuck (slide). I SAID it was on purpose. Obviously Justin was supposed to expose her bra under her shirt, not her fucking TIT. o_O <br /><br />Lord. The simplicity in some people really sometimes astonishes me.Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-3754292589180123882012-01-28T13:13:57.006-08:002012-01-28T13:13:57.006-08:00she OBVIOUSLY made shitty music post Super Bowl.. ...she OBVIOUSLY made shitty music post Super Bowl.. but Nipplegate was the nail in her coffin! It was an UDDER disaster!!! lol (nice one, Pud)slidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01371580656799446172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-20347237740598898942012-01-28T09:35:47.772-08:002012-01-28T09:35:47.772-08:00Most definitely done on purpose! How can people b...Most definitely done on purpose! How can people be so clueless (rolling eyes)slidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01371580656799446172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-41270088324399340662012-01-28T08:56:32.897-08:002012-01-28T08:56:32.897-08:00I hear crickets...I hear crickets...The B Listhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033077902470780905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-50385615602142497022012-01-28T08:55:12.876-08:002012-01-28T08:55:12.876-08:00Tony I think it was real. Madonna did the Kiss at...Tony I think it was real. Madonna did the Kiss at the MTV awards and Im sure Janet wanted to top that after seeing how much attention it got in the media. Unfortunately if failed for her.The B Listhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033077902470780905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-90409474283869392072012-01-28T08:53:27.042-08:002012-01-28T08:53:27.042-08:00Me too..I agree.Me too..I agree.The B Listhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033077902470780905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-10086058554634925732012-01-28T08:52:31.437-08:002012-01-28T08:52:31.437-08:00Totally agree with the Whitney, Janet and Mariah a...Totally agree with the Whitney, Janet and Mariah and even Gwen comment.The B Listhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033077902470780905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-92093295248187410822012-01-28T08:51:46.160-08:002012-01-28T08:51:46.160-08:00Very true Tony. I think she choose the wrong prod...Very true Tony. I think she choose the wrong producers the last 3 albums. Though each of those albums had some good singles potential, her record company kept screwing her over by not letting her choose the single to released. Anyways, janet was amazing back in the day. She was on par with madonna back then. I miss the back in the day Paula Abdul too. This just shows that Madonna is a living legend compared to the rest.The B Listhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033077902470780905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-16002703514767222812012-01-28T07:57:21.477-08:002012-01-28T07:57:21.477-08:00Ok, well the topic has turned to a Janet vs Madonn...Ok, well the topic has turned to a Janet vs Madonna which is so 1993! geez. Janet had some good tracks and did her thing BUT honesty it was based on the Madonna recipe. Madonna laid it out for her. Janet isn't a very strong spirit in my opinion. Madonna is a very strong woman. Thats why janet wasn't able to keep the fan base or keep relevant. I wished more of Madonnas vintage contemporaries would surface but they all got lazy or fucked up. <br />I wish i saw Whitney, Janet and Mariah and even Gwen coming out press worthy material. Now its seems Madonna has to be pitted against 25 and under no substance pop acts. YAWN...zzzzzzzzzzzAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-42993156250632605802012-01-27T23:45:40.026-08:002012-01-27T23:45:40.026-08:00And BTW, Madonna said doesn't mean cutting edg...And BTW, Madonna said doesn't mean cutting edge if you do show breasts, obviously referring to herself as well.<br /><br />I certainly don't think this was a dig at Janet.Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-9500849179128114812012-01-27T23:44:14.577-08:002012-01-27T23:44:14.577-08:00You mean The Drowned World Tour? I agree, awful :(...You mean The Drowned World Tour? I agree, awful :(Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-46483541505674918082012-01-27T23:43:38.517-08:002012-01-27T23:43:38.517-08:00Madonna and Janet were totally opposite. Madonna w...Madonna and Janet were totally opposite. Madonna was pure pop, while Janet was more R&B/Pop and that whole cheerleader dancing style was all Janet. Madonna rarely danced like that, though I love when she did (American Life video).Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-14404620797437642832012-01-27T23:42:11.231-08:002012-01-27T23:42:11.231-08:00Justin ripping off the part around her breast was ...Justin ripping off the part around her breast was OBVIOUSLY done on purpose. Not the part AND her bra. lol.<br /><br />some people. I mean, really?Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-39770995068610950422012-01-27T23:39:37.502-08:002012-01-27T23:39:37.502-08:00I love Janet, well, older Janet and I think I migh...I love Janet, well, older Janet and I think I might be one of the only ones who believe that Superbowl thing really was an accident. It didn't end her career, the shitty music she released after that incident ended her career.Tonyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863069459025815561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-48461724845925086102012-01-27T23:15:48.266-08:002012-01-27T23:15:48.266-08:00True. Lick my hole.True. Lick my hole.Maarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18097741406329585140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-63727760647368248602012-01-27T21:16:51.974-08:002012-01-27T21:16:51.974-08:00Taste is on the tongue of the beholder or b-holer!...Taste is on the tongue of the beholder or b-holer!!!DLUVSMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02493601408404116522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-80068489502535421002012-01-27T21:11:13.086-08:002012-01-27T21:11:13.086-08:00Go fuck yourself and troll on a Janet "Oopsie...Go fuck yourself and troll on a Janet "Oopsie nipple" Jackson page.<br /><br />Let me repeat this again:<br /><br />You have to be a moron, a complete ignorant brainless motherfucker to ignore the different contexts (medium and time) where both (Madonna and Janet Jackson) have been “naughty:<br /><br />When Madonna published her SEX book, you had to be an ADULT to buy it. When Madonna released the album “Erotica”, it came with a Parental Advisory sticker. " <br /><br />When Janet showed her nipple on national TV during the Super Bowl halftime show in 2004, there were children watching it. It was not an X rated event, nor was it directed to an adult-only audience.<br /><br />Not to mention that in the early 90s, America was under an extremely prudish rhetoric. So Madonna’s nudity, her point of you on gay sex, safe sex, and Aids meant something. On the other hand, when Janet Jackson showed her nipple at the Super Bowl, the ”slutty way of life” was the norm in the media: Britney, Christina, they were all singing about sex to their teenage fans or performing in skin-color “see-through” outfits at the VMAs. Janet’s nipple had no purpose in 2004. Did it stand for freedom of speech or female empowerment in 2004? No. Madonna did it for her in the 80s and 90s.<br /><br />So, yeah, that is the subtle difference between Madonna showing her nipples (and a lot more) in the early 90s, and Janet showing hers at the Super Bowl. Intentionality and appropriacy - have you guys ever heard of these?<br /><br />Madonna’s risqué moments had a purpose and they happened at an appropriate time, and don’t forget: they were all age appropriate too. Can’t say the same about slutty desperate Janet Jackson and her ugly nipple at the family-oriented Super Bowl.Lindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12194891307943252480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-38615426065058626892012-01-27T20:51:35.550-08:002012-01-27T20:51:35.550-08:00You have to be a moron, a complete ignorant brainl...You have to be a moron, a complete ignorant brainless motherfucker to ignore the different contexts (medium and time) where both (Madonna and Janet Jackson) have been “naughty:<br /><br />When Madonna published her SEX book, you had to be an ADULT to buy it. When Madonna released the album “Erotica”, it came with a Parental Advisory sticker. " <br /><br />When Janet showed her nipple on national TV during the Super Bowl halftime show in 2004, there were children watching it. It was not an X rated event, nor was it directed to an adult-only audience.<br /><br />Not to mention that in the early 90s, America was under an extremely prudish rhetoric. So Madonna’s nudity, her point of you on gay sex, safe sex, and Aids meant something. On the other hand, when Janet Jackson showed her nipple at the Super Bowl, the ”slutty way of life” was the norm in the media: Britney, Christina, they were all singing about sex to their teenage fans or performing in skin-color “see-through” outfits at the VMAs. Janet’s nipple had no purpose in 2004. Did it stand for freedom of speech or female empowerment in 2004? No. Madonna did it for her in the 80s and 90s.<br /><br />So, yeah, that is the subtle difference between Madonna showing her nipples (and a lot more) in the early 90s, and Janet showing hers at the Super Bowl. Intentionality and appropriacy - have you guys ever heard of these?<br /><br />Madonna’s risqué moments had a purpose and they happened at an appropriate time, and don’t forget: they were all age appropriate too. Can’t say the same about slutty desperate Janet Jackson and her ugly nipple at the family-oriented Super Bowl.Lindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12194891307943252480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1741750437311864307.post-38948571053519892882012-01-27T20:50:48.916-08:002012-01-27T20:50:48.916-08:00Just like I said on my tumblr:
You have to be a m...Just like I said on my tumblr:<br /><br />You have to be a moron, a complete ignorant brainless motherfucker to ignore the different contexts (medium and time) where both (Madonna and Janet Jackson) have been “naughty:<br /><br />When Madonna published her SEX book, you had to be an ADULT to buy it. When Madonna released the album “Erotica”, it came with a Parental Advisory sticker. " <br /><br />When Janet showed her nipple on national TV during the Super Bowl halftime show in 2004, there were children watching it. It was not an X rated event, nor was it directed to an adult-only audience.<br /><br />Not to mention that in the early 90s, America was under an extremely prudish rhetoric. So Madonna’s nudity, her point of you on gay sex, safe sex, and Aids meant something. On the other hand, when Janet Jackson showed her nipple at the Super Bowl, the ”slutty way of life” was the norm in the media: Britney, Christina, they were all singing about sex to their teenage fans or performing in skin-color “see-through” outfits at the VMAs. Janet’s nipple had no purpose in 2004. Did it stand for freedom of speech or female empowerment in 2004? No. Madonna did it for her in the 80s and 90s.<br /><br />So, yeah, that is the subtle difference between Madonna showing her nipples (and a lot more) in the early 90s, and Janet showing hers at the Super Bowl. Intentionality and appropriacy - have you guys ever heard of these?<br /><br />Madonna’s risqué moments had a purpose and they happened at an appropriate time, and don’t forget: they were all age appropriate too. Can’t say the same about slutty desperate Janet Jackson and her ugly nipple at the family-oriented Super Bowl.Lindahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12194891307943252480noreply@blogger.com